For the next step on the way to understanding technology, I simply looked the word up in the dictionary. To be more specific, I looked it up on Merriam-Webster Online. Perhaps the dictionary definition can more accurately sum up the complexities of technology in a way I couldn't.
Merriam-Webster states that technology is "the practical application of knowledge in a particular area." (Merriam-Webster). Of the three definitions included, this is the most relevant to this issue. This definition covers I wide range of technological achievements. Unfortunately it fails to address the fact that technology doesn't have to be practical. Let's look at the modern SUV. Now, I'm all for the use of gasoline as a fuel source. I say use it until its gone, then find something else. But despite the fact that Americans love their gas guzzlers, they aren't practical. If we were doing the practical thing, car companies would all come out with the most gas efficient car they could. Yet millions of people are willing to pay more at the pump for a bigger, flashier vehicle. That may be their prerogative, and if they willing money for size, then more power to them. However, it is not practical. Even if we were to take the word practical out, this definition still fails to address the purpose of technology. It may incompletely sum up what, but not why. I had hoped to find a way to articulate why we develop technology.
It seems as if I still have more research to do. However, I have not been without progress. I may have found the beginning of my working definition of technology. It's vague and rather two dimensional, but at least it's a start. Perhaps I will be able to build on this definition and make it more complete.